The industry says that they can. Neighbors and environmentalists say that they can't. The two sides argue their positions and a public debate ensues. Let's examine what both sides can agree on:
-Collectively, we are using natural gas to heat our homes, generate electricity, and fuel industrial processes. We can't simply cut off our supply of natural gas or oil.
-Nobody wants to make anybody sick. It is not the intention of the industry to pollute.
-Oil/gas development is an inherently dangerous business. Accidents happen.
-Emissions from oil/gas wells are contributing to air pollution. Air pollution in CO is a problem that needs to be remediated.
-State records show an unacceptable amount of water pollution from oil/gas development activities.
-Oil/gas development creates jobs and revenue. Jobs and revenue are important.
So, how can we meet our energy, employment and economic needs without poisoning our living space?
The Colorado Oil and Gas Association (COGA) says they can do this through responsible oil/gas development, but history shows otherwise and neighbors and environmentalists don't trust them. Some neighbors and environmentalists say we should ban oil/gas drilling all together, but that leaves us without our energy source and cuts jobs and revenue.
To prove their point to neighbors and environmentalists, we asking COGA to provide, in populated areas that are drilled, continuous air quality monitoring equipment and a "reverse 911" type alert system. If the air is toxic, the equipment detects it immediately and sends a signal to the managers of any potential nearby sources of the pollution (gas well, gas station, other industrial facilities). The managers check their pollution control equipment and make sure that everything is on par. When a problem is found it is fixed immediately. If the problem isn't fixed, then law enforcement gets involved.
The alert is also sent to nearby residents so that they can take action to protect themselves and hold polluters accountable to fixing their problems. This way we can all be assured that any pollution problems that arise are taken care of in a timely fashion.
Water quality assurance requires different technology. Current monitoring standards are not good enough. Each well should be injected with a signature tracer so that any pollution can be traced to the source. Water quality monitoring equipment needs to be within 100 ft of the well, down gradient, and samples need to be taken on a monthly basis. Transparency is key to the whole process. Data needs to be readily available to the public.
Air and water quality monitoring comes with a financial cost, and the creation of more jobs and revenue. This is the cost of doing business in an industry that has the potential to poison our air and water.
One more thing. A recent accident near Windsor spewed toxic fluid up to 1,000 ft from the rig for 30 hours. This was an unanticipated event. If it happened at a well within 1,000 ft of an elementary school, the result could be catastrophic for those involved. This demonstrates the need to keep wells more than 1,000ft from anywhere where people live or congregate.
We are asking the neighbors and environmentalists to help satisfy our energy and economic needs without poisoning our living space by promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy systems and jobs. We are also asking them to accept the "drilling with monitoring, alerts, and mitigation" deal.
Ultimately we need to meet our needs without fossil fuels, but I wouldn't expect GOGA to promote that. I do expect them to hold their industry to the highest standards, prove that they are not polluting, and fix pollution problems as soon as they occur.