<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Mon, 28 May 2012 04:48:01 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blog</title><link>http://cforse.org/blog/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:17:58 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Loveland Update Letter to Mayor</title><dc:creator>cforse</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:16:52 +0000</pubDate><link>http://cforse.org/blog/2012/4/26/loveland-update-letter-to-mayor.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1042200:11985888:16015228</guid><description><![CDATA[<div class="gmail_extra">Hello Mr. Mayor and Gretchen</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"></div>
<div class="gmail_extra">I'm writing to touch base and provide feedback that we have gotten from Loveland residents so far.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"></div>
<div class="gmail_extra">We asked Loveland residents, "Should Loveland adopt an energy policy focused on reducing bills through efficiency, and promoting renewable energy sources when economically feasible?"</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"></div>
<div class="gmail_extra">We received the following responses over 8 days so far:</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"></div>
<div class="gmail_extra">contacts: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;954 people</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">responses: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;581</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">"Yes" response: &nbsp;544</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">"No" response: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;37</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"></div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Number of people who signed a supporting statement: &nbsp;302</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Number of people who contributed financially: &nbsp;164 &nbsp; Average amount: &nbsp;$19.10</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Number of people who wrote letters: &nbsp;86</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"></div>
<div class="gmail_extra">You may recall that in 2009 we did something very similar and Director Ralph Mulinex recommended a city sponsored survey in response to 92 letters received asking for home efficiency programs. &nbsp;The result is a successful program today to help Loveland residents reduce waste. &nbsp;This program is a great step but there is still much work to done and LWP needs guidance from city leadership to do it.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"></div>
<div class="gmail_extra">There are over 1,400 CforSE members in Loveland that have contributed financially over the past four years. What can I tell them about Loveland's progress in adopting such an energy policy so far?</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"></div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Thank you very much for your time and efforts!</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://cforse.org/blog/rss-comments-entry-16015228.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Loveland Energy Policy</title><dc:creator>cforse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 00:36:46 +0000</pubDate><link>http://cforse.org/blog/2012/4/20/loveland-energy-policy.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1042200:11985888:15933825</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>We have now canvassed for 4 days in Loveland talking to folks about a potential Loveland Energy Policy based upon reducing bills through efficiency, and transitioning to renewable energy options as they become economically available. &nbsp;Of the 291 people asked so far, 271 (93%) said that they support the idea.</p>
<p>We began working on this campaign because Loveland Water &amp; Power (LWP) is having success with their home efficiency program and they want to pursue more options, but they need goals and a road map to direct their efforts. &nbsp;This direction needs to come from council, and council needs direction from the citizenry. &nbsp;That's where we come in. &nbsp;We raise public awareness of this possibility and present public support to council so that they are informed of the desires of the community. &nbsp;Once council decides to get to work on this, Loveland Water &amp; Power can work out the details and work with council and the citizens to craft and adopt the best policy options.</p>
<p>In general, we want a policy that sets a goal to reduce purchased power by "X" amount, by "X" date and instructs LWP to pursue programs that help residents become more energy efficient and support the growth of renewable energy production within the city. &nbsp;Examples of these programs might include financing for energy improvements to your property through your electric bill (Fort Collins just adopted this), and development of a Community Solar Garden (Colorado Springs and Poudre Valley REA recently started these).</p>
<p>There are many reasons to pursue such a policy. &nbsp;Economically it makes sense to reduce waste at home and thus reduce monthly bills. &nbsp;It makes sense to reduce waste as a community and reduce the need for expensive capital projects like transmission lines and power plants (next one now scheduled for 2020 at the cost of $80 million). &nbsp;This policy can also stimulate job growth in the local building retrofitting, and renewable energy, industries.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If that is something that you support, please contribute to the cause using the "Give Online" button, and write to the city council asking them to "adopt an energy policy that promotes energy efficiency and renewable energy to reduce the amount of power that Loveland must purchase".</p>
<p><a href="mailto:ccouncil@ci.loveland.co.us">ccouncil@ci.loveland.co.us</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://cforse.org/blog/rss-comments-entry-15933825.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Governor responds with a load of...</title><dc:creator>cforse</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:47:50 +0000</pubDate><link>http://cforse.org/blog/2012/4/18/governor-responds-with-a-load-of.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1042200:11985888:15901995</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The following email was sent in response to the question, "What are you doing to reduce dependency on fossil fuels in CO?" &nbsp;The referred to bill (HB12-1315) restructures the Governor's Energy Office to promote natural gas development. &nbsp;Hardly reducing dependence on fossil fuels! &nbsp;Other than that, this response says absolutely nothing except that Governor Hickenlooper is full of a substance that is expelled from the body as waste!</p>
<p>He has a long way to go to get my support!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>Dear fred:</span><br /><br /><span>Thank you for writing regarding the GEO. The new Colorado Energy Office will promote all types of energy that protect the environment, lower long-term consumer costs, and increase energy security.</span><br /><br /><span>HB12-1315 will create the type of &nbsp;&ldquo;all of the above&rdquo; energy office that the President has been championing. Colorado will not only build on our national brand as a leader in energy conservation and renewable clean energy, we will also cement our reputation for energy innovation.</span><br /><br /><span>Our state has a long history of creating and deploying technology that allow us to access new energy resources and improve upon the efficiency of existing ones. The State of Colorado is committed to promoting any innovative energy technology, no matter if the fuel source is wind, gas, or coal, as long as that energy can benefit the environment and save consumers money.</span><br /><br /><span>Once again, thank you for writing to the Governor's Office. We appreciate your concerns and will keep your thoughts in mind as we move forward.</span><br /><br /><br /><span>Sincerely,</span><br /><br /><span>Governor's Office of Correspondence</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://cforse.org/blog/rss-comments-entry-15901995.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Update to the PVREA update</title><dc:creator>cforse</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:53:27 +0000</pubDate><link>http://cforse.org/blog/2012/4/12/update-to-the-pvrea-update.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1042200:11985888:15820846</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>PVREA communications specialist Ric Soulin filled me in on some of the details of PVREA's current efforts to help members become more energy efficient. &nbsp;PVREA has contracted out the management of their programs to the Governor's Energy Office allowing them to leverage their funds with those of the GEO and use experienced energy efficiency agencies such as Long's Peak Energy Conservation. &nbsp;The GEO will likely not exist in the same capacity next year, but Ric assures me that PVREA is dedicated to keeping energy bills low for their members, and that they will continue efficiency programs even if the GEO does not.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://cforse.org/blog/rss-comments-entry-15820846.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Poudre Valley Rural Electric Association (PVREA) update</title><dc:creator>cforse</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:47:31 +0000</pubDate><link>http://cforse.org/blog/2012/3/27/poudre-valley-rural-electric-association-pvrea-update.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1042200:11985888:15616218</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>2yrs ago cforse members wrote to PVREA asking for a program to help low income families, not with money to simply pay their bills, but with energy efficiency upgrades to reduce their bills. &nbsp;PVREA responded with the CARE program which provided up to $1,200 in weatherization and insulation per project for income qualified households. &nbsp;The program was apparently "too successful" and they used all of their allocated funds ahead of schedule. &nbsp;This past year they decided to use the State's weatherization program instead. &nbsp;The problem is that the federal tax funding for the State program is going to run out long before the job gets done as well. &nbsp;</p>
<p>What we need, all over CO, is a sustainable financing mechanism for energy efficiency upgrades. &nbsp;Kansas has it, Kentucky has it, New York, California, Michigan... 22 states have On-Bill Financing which pays for energy efficiency upgrades using the savings generated on energy bills. &nbsp;It is a revolving fund, when the money is paid back, the rural t associations loan it out again. &nbsp;PVREA and Tri-State could be providing this service to us, but they say it's too hard :-( &nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mwenergy.com/howsmart.aspx">Midwest Energy</a> in Kansas has helped other REA's to set up this program and they are willing to help PVREA and Tri-State. &nbsp;PVREA members need to remind the board who they work for. &nbsp;Write to PVREA and tell them to work with Midwest Energy on bringing an On-Bill Financing mechanism to Colorado REAs.</p>
<p>The annual meeting is this Saturday (March 31st). &nbsp;You can go and vote for board members, or you can mail a ballot in by Wednesday. &nbsp;For more info: <a href="http://www.pvrea.com">www.pvrea.com</a></p>
<p>We like Steve Szabo and Roger Alexander in this election.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>On the plus side, PVREA has started a solar garden option, so check that out too!</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://cforse.org/blog/rss-comments-entry-15616218.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Time for Governor Hickenlooper to respond to grassroots demand for more Oil &amp; Gas accountability</title><dc:creator>cforse</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:44:36 +0000</pubDate><link>http://cforse.org/blog/2012/3/13/time-for-governor-hickenlooper-to-respond-to-grassroots-dema.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1042200:11985888:15418899</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Over the past 6 months there has been an uproar from concerned citizens throughout the state to clean up the oil and gas industry. &nbsp;This uproar is in response to the industry moving into populated areas and suburban neighborhoods without establishing the confidence that they will do there job without negatively impacting public health. &nbsp;The&nbsp;lack of confidence comes from a history of gross negligence when it comes to preventing pollution and a policy of covering up and downplaying the impacts of their pollution. &nbsp;The industry continues to misinform the public and the Governor has joined in.</p>
<p>The good news is that citizens and environmental groups are not falling for it. &nbsp;Independant investigation finds that the state's own records show that current pollution is massive and should not be accepted, but the state does little about it. &nbsp;That's why citizens in Erie, Longmont, Aurora, Colorado Springs, Boulder County, and Commerce City have gone to their local government for action, passing moratoriums and standards that take steps towards protecting public health. &nbsp;</p>
<p>This action has pressured the Governor into addressing the situation and convening a task force to deal with the problem. &nbsp;We must remain vigilant to make sure the Governor is not simply trying to placate citizens' concerns, but that real action is taken to prevent pollution. &nbsp;Northern Colorado does not currently meet federal air quality standards. &nbsp;What will happen if we add 100,000 new oil and gas wells to the region without implementing better pollution controls? &nbsp;</p>
<p>And the wacky thing is that industry could actually make more money by using these controls to capture escaping hydrocarbons for sale. &nbsp;They don't do that now because they don't feel that it is worth their time and effort. &nbsp;The health of the local population is not worth their time and effort. &nbsp;That is why we have government.</p>
<p>To date CforSE has generated over 390 letters to the Governor asking him to reduce the pollution for oil and gas operations.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://cforse.org/blog/rss-comments-entry-15418899.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Erie, CO fighting for a quality of life</title><dc:creator>cforse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:00:26 +0000</pubDate><link>http://cforse.org/blog/2012/2/11/erie-co-fighting-for-a-quality-of-life.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1042200:11985888:14993113</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Ground zero in the new "gas patch" of Colorado. &nbsp;Plenty of other places in CO (too many) have seen the kind of drilling that is occurring in Erie, but if you live in northern CO and you want to see what the gas patch on the front range looks like, take a drive through Erie. &nbsp;You will notice condensate tanks scattered across the landscape (tan, round tanks). &nbsp;These tanks emit Hazardous Air Pollutants such as Benzene. &nbsp;The one just upwind of the high-school on Erie Parkway emits 10.66 tons per year of Volatile Organic Compounds including Benzene (about the same as a large gas station). &nbsp;Within a 5 km radius of the school oil/gas facilities emit over 412 tons per year (according to CO Air Pollution Control Division).&nbsp;</p>
<p>Encana, an oil drilling company (with the distinction of having the largest fine in CO history), is planning on drilling and fracing 8 wells on a pad 350 feet from Erie Elementary School.</p>
<p>It's time to stop sacrificing our health and environment for the profit margin of the most profitable industry in history! &nbsp;For a fraction more in financial expense the industry could operate in a safe and trusted manner.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 140%;">For more info check out: <a href="http://gcmonitor.org/article.php?id=1339">http://gcmonitor.org/article.php?id=1339</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 140%;">For more about Erie specifics and getting involved: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.erierising.com">www.erierising.com</a></span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://cforse.org/blog/rss-comments-entry-14993113.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Steamboat</title><dc:creator>cforse</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:31:44 +0000</pubDate><link>http://cforse.org/blog/2012/2/5/steamboat.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1042200:11985888:14888689</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Jared, Alex, Zak, and Derek will be canvassing in Steamboat Springs Monday, Feb. 6 through Wednesday the 8th as part of our statewide campaign to ensure that public health is protected from the dangers of oil &amp; gas development. &nbsp;</p>
<p>Routt County has been dealing with their own oil &amp; gas issues and there will be a public forum with county commissioners and State officials on Feb. 21st at 5:30. &nbsp;</p>
<div id="_mcePaste">which will be held in&nbsp;</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">the Routt County Commissioners&rsquo; Hearing Room, except where specified, on the third floor of the&nbsp;</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Historic Courthouse Building, 522 Lincoln Ave., Steamboat Springs. Questions regarding these meetings&nbsp;</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">should be directed to the Routt County Commissioners Office at (970) 879-0108.&nbsp;</div>
<div></div>
<div>For more information check out: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.routtcountyfrack.org">www.RouttCountyFrack.org</a></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://cforse.org/blog/rss-comments-entry-14888689.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Fracking could happen as far west as Golden, Lyons, and Boulder</title><dc:creator>cforse</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:49:48 +0000</pubDate><link>http://cforse.org/blog/2012/1/30/fracking-could-happen-as-far-west-as-golden-lyons-and-boulde-1.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1042200:11985888:14798949</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span>great new mapping on line that shows the extent of the Niobrara -- this oil rich formation, the Niobrara, goes all the west right up to the Golden fault, so there is potential for drilling in all of these cities Boulder, Denver, Aurora, even all of Lakewood, heck drilling could go as far west as the foothills west of Golden since there is an overthust of the mountains there.</span></p>
<div></div>
<div>the intent here is to assuage the angst of us citizens by allowing any one to locate any point on the map within this box and determine the depth to the Niobrara, the thickness of the overlying Pierre Shale that overlies the Niobrara which should prevent upward migration of frack fluids into the Fox Hills aquifer that is on top the Pierre shale. &nbsp;The Fox Hills formation is the deepest aquifer, there are three aquifers above: the Laramie, the Denver Fm and in some locations the alluvial aquifer.</div>
<div>these layers are in this order going down:</div>
<div>Alluvial aquifer</div>
<div>Denver Fm</div>
<div>Laramie Fm</div>
<div>Fox Hills</div>
<div>Pierre Shale</div>
<div>Niobrara</div>
<div>D Sands and J Sands of the Dakota Formation -- this is the historic oil and gas field that produces in the Wattenburg Field, so keep in mind that all wells drilled into the Niobrara will be above these 1000s of previous oil and gas wells, so any abandoned well not properly sealed could be a conduit upward for pollution as every prior oil and gas well penetrated right thru the Niobrara Fm.</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://cforse.org/blog/rss-comments-entry-14798949.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Let's do this next to our schools and in our neighborhoods</title><dc:creator>cforse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:32:44 +0000</pubDate><link>http://cforse.org/blog/2012/1/21/lets-do-this-next-to-our-schools-and-in-our-neighborhoods.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1042200:11985888:14680912</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/kV02b_Vt_hI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://cforse.org/blog/rss-comments-entry-14680912.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>
